<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why we chose ASP.NET to run our startup</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.jumptree.com/index.php/2007/why-we-chose-aspnet-to-run-our-startup/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.jumptree.com/2007/why-we-chose-aspnet-to-run-our-startup/</link>
	<description>a guide to project management, business, coding and anything else that we can think of.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 18:51:39 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RoyalChaos - Wahyudis Digital Playground</title>
		<link>http://blog.jumptree.com/2007/why-we-chose-aspnet-to-run-our-startup/comment-page-1/#comment-277</link>
		<dc:creator>RoyalChaos - Wahyudis Digital Playground</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 20:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jumptree.com/2007/why-we-chose-aspnet-to-run-our-startup/#comment-277</guid>
		<description>[...] out an interview of JumptreeÂ a startup that uses ASP .Net as their framework. I also found InterviewUpÂ that based on .Net as [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] out an interview of JumptreeÂ a startup that uses ASP .Net as their framework. I also found InterviewUpÂ that based on .Net as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Editor at BestDotNet.com</title>
		<link>http://blog.jumptree.com/2007/why-we-chose-aspnet-to-run-our-startup/comment-page-1/#comment-247</link>
		<dc:creator>Editor at BestDotNet.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 16:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jumptree.com/2007/why-we-chose-aspnet-to-run-our-startup/#comment-247</guid>
		<description>Totally agree with this post. .Net is easy in many ways for medium sized company. For higher traffic sites, .net has still a long way to go. 

Most of the .net problems are with Windows OS  not being as reliable as Unix &amp; Linux Servers. 

.Net is beautiful for its simplicity in lot of ways. 

Framework 3.0 is simply beautiful. 

Microsoft should open up. Should release run-time for Unix/Linux. It could make whole lot of money if it embraces Linux. MS Linux sounds sweet to me. 

From the publisher of
http://www.bestdotnet.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally agree with this post. .Net is easy in many ways for medium sized company. For higher traffic sites, .net has still a long way to go. </p>
<p>Most of the .net problems are with Windows OS  not being as reliable as Unix &amp; Linux Servers. </p>
<p>.Net is beautiful for its simplicity in lot of ways. </p>
<p>Framework 3.0 is simply beautiful. </p>
<p>Microsoft should open up. Should release run-time for Unix/Linux. It could make whole lot of money if it embraces Linux. MS Linux sounds sweet to me. </p>
<p>From the publisher of<br />
<a href="http://www.bestdotnet.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.bestdotnet.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liming Xu</title>
		<link>http://blog.jumptree.com/2007/why-we-chose-aspnet-to-run-our-startup/comment-page-1/#comment-243</link>
		<dc:creator>Liming Xu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 19:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jumptree.com/2007/why-we-chose-aspnet-to-run-our-startup/#comment-243</guid>
		<description>@Ashish: The resources and community for .NET is one of the things I like the most about it.

Overall the people seem a little less snarky... for example, if a newbie has a very basic question, people are more willing to answer it instead of telling them to search first.

And yeah... getting a complex .NET app on Mono can be a challenge. That&#039;s one area I wish Microsoft would address. I realize they don&#039;t want to cannibalize their Windows Servers sales, but still, wouldn&#039;t spreading .NET and .NET tools like Visual Studio help offset that?

***

@Dave: Thanks for the support :) Just a note, but our software is actually install-on-your-own-server software. We thought about SaaS, but in the end, realized that most companies would prefer to host their own data.

***

@Siraj: I can&#039;t wait for those as well!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ashish: The resources and community for .NET is one of the things I like the most about it.</p>
<p>Overall the people seem a little less snarky&#8230; for example, if a newbie has a very basic question, people are more willing to answer it instead of telling them to search first.</p>
<p>And yeah&#8230; getting a complex .NET app on Mono can be a challenge. That&#8217;s one area I wish Microsoft would address. I realize they don&#8217;t want to cannibalize their Windows Servers sales, but still, wouldn&#8217;t spreading .NET and .NET tools like Visual Studio help offset that?</p>
<p>***</p>
<p>@Dave: Thanks for the support <img src='http://blog.jumptree.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Just a note, but our software is actually install-on-your-own-server software. We thought about SaaS, but in the end, realized that most companies would prefer to host their own data.</p>
<p>***</p>
<p>@Siraj: I can&#8217;t wait for those as well!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siraj</title>
		<link>http://blog.jumptree.com/2007/why-we-chose-aspnet-to-run-our-startup/comment-page-1/#comment-242</link>
		<dc:creator>Siraj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 18:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jumptree.com/2007/why-we-chose-aspnet-to-run-our-startup/#comment-242</guid>
		<description>I  love .Net, thanks foe good info of .Net, waiting for .Net 3.5, VS 2008 and SQL 2008  ... ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I  love .Net, thanks foe good info of .Net, waiting for .Net 3.5, VS 2008 and SQL 2008  &#8230; &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Ward</title>
		<link>http://blog.jumptree.com/2007/why-we-chose-aspnet-to-run-our-startup/comment-page-1/#comment-215</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Ward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 13:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jumptree.com/2007/why-we-chose-aspnet-to-run-our-startup/#comment-215</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s great to see a SaaS startup like this on the .NET platform.  Best of luck to you guys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s great to see a SaaS startup like this on the .NET platform.  Best of luck to you guys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashish Srivastava</title>
		<link>http://blog.jumptree.com/2007/why-we-chose-aspnet-to-run-our-startup/comment-page-1/#comment-211</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashish Srivastava</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 05:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jumptree.com/2007/why-we-chose-aspnet-to-run-our-startup/#comment-211</guid>
		<description>I worked on Java, LAMP and .NET. I enjoyed all the platoforms. .NET is a bit special because this platforms provides great resources like libraries, excellent tools (Visual Studio) and itegrated environment (IIS, SQL Server, Office development, MS CRM, MS Sharepoint, Biztalk). All these things makes its first choice for projects starting form small desktop utilities to large enterprise products. Again it depends on requirement. its not easy to run complex .NET application on linux box even using Mono.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I worked on Java, LAMP and .NET. I enjoyed all the platoforms. .NET is a bit special because this platforms provides great resources like libraries, excellent tools (Visual Studio) and itegrated environment (IIS, SQL Server, Office development, MS CRM, MS Sharepoint, Biztalk). All these things makes its first choice for projects starting form small desktop utilities to large enterprise products. Again it depends on requirement. its not easy to run complex .NET application on linux box even using Mono.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liming Xu</title>
		<link>http://blog.jumptree.com/2007/why-we-chose-aspnet-to-run-our-startup/comment-page-1/#comment-203</link>
		<dc:creator>Liming Xu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 01:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jumptree.com/2007/why-we-chose-aspnet-to-run-our-startup/#comment-203</guid>
		<description>Jish, 

Based on my .NET and Java experiences, the performance is comparable, the only difference is in one&#039;s implementation. 

Someone might say ASP.NET ViewState slows down the page load time, but that argument is false in its assumption in my personal opinion.  

In comparison to many other implementations which use session state or other approaches, I like viewstate much better as long as you don&#039;t abuse it. That&#039;s the key. 

Hope that helps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jish, </p>
<p>Based on my .NET and Java experiences, the performance is comparable, the only difference is in one&#8217;s implementation. </p>
<p>Someone might say ASP.NET ViewState slows down the page load time, but that argument is false in its assumption in my personal opinion.  </p>
<p>In comparison to many other implementations which use session state or other approaches, I like viewstate much better as long as you don&#8217;t abuse it. That&#8217;s the key. </p>
<p>Hope that helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jish</title>
		<link>http://blog.jumptree.com/2007/why-we-chose-aspnet-to-run-our-startup/comment-page-1/#comment-202</link>
		<dc:creator>Jish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 00:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jumptree.com/2007/why-we-chose-aspnet-to-run-our-startup/#comment-202</guid>
		<description>newbie question...


is there any issue in performance?
meaning a web site built on .NET vs anything that you experts mention, will it have the same performance to load, to retrieve, to post etc?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>newbie question&#8230;</p>
<p>is there any issue in performance?<br />
meaning a web site built on .NET vs anything that you experts mention, will it have the same performance to load, to retrieve, to post etc?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liming Xu</title>
		<link>http://blog.jumptree.com/2007/why-we-chose-aspnet-to-run-our-startup/comment-page-1/#comment-201</link>
		<dc:creator>Liming Xu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 05:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jumptree.com/2007/why-we-chose-aspnet-to-run-our-startup/#comment-201</guid>
		<description>Hi AJ,

I can definitely relate. I remember telling my friends (mainly Java and PHP developers) that I was choosing .NET and they all just stood their in silence.

The sad thing is none of them have even used .NET and yet they still bash it... oh well, they don&#039;t know what they&#039;re missing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi AJ,</p>
<p>I can definitely relate. I remember telling my friends (mainly Java and PHP developers) that I was choosing .NET and they all just stood their in silence.</p>
<p>The sad thing is none of them have even used .NET and yet they still bash it&#8230; oh well, they don&#8217;t know what they&#8217;re missing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arie</title>
		<link>http://blog.jumptree.com/2007/why-we-chose-aspnet-to-run-our-startup/comment-page-1/#comment-200</link>
		<dc:creator>Arie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 01:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jumptree.com/2007/why-we-chose-aspnet-to-run-our-startup/#comment-200</guid>
		<description>Liming Xu,
A friend of mine just sent me your post. I get this argument all the time because I am running the Microsoft side of a business that for years was exclusively Oracle,Java,Linux,Unix,etc...I can definitely say from programming all the way up from a TSR-80 Model III..yes the trash 80. I have programmed in just about everything under the sun and came into the Microsoft realm in college and never looked back. There are definitely &#039;cool&#039; MS tech folks out there...contrary to Dave&#039;s belief....we just don&#039;t like to brag about it:0)

Cheers,
AJ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liming Xu,<br />
A friend of mine just sent me your post. I get this argument all the time because I am running the Microsoft side of a business that for years was exclusively Oracle,Java,Linux,Unix,etc&#8230;I can definitely say from programming all the way up from a TSR-80 Model III..yes the trash 80. I have programmed in just about everything under the sun and came into the Microsoft realm in college and never looked back. There are definitely &#8216;cool&#8217; MS tech folks out there&#8230;contrary to Dave&#8217;s belief&#8230;.we just don&#8217;t like to brag about it:0)</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
AJ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
